Regarding dimension out-of personal jealousy, about 40 care about-declaration tools was in fact claimed because production of this new Worry about-Report and Projective Envy Balances (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Of a lot tools were utilized only when. , 1992) designed to determine sex variations; the Multidimensional Jealousy Level (Pfeiffer site for bbw & Wong, 1989) made to measure the three proportions of envy (cognitive, mental and behavioral dimensions); the fresh new Facebook Envy Scale (Muise, Christofides, & Des) aimed at researching the possibilities of a conference which causes thoughts regarding jealousy professionals related to its pastime with the Facebook; the newest Envy Level (Buunk, 1997), regularly look at three type of envy (activated, anxious and you can preventive) and the Social Jealousy Size (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), which evaluates new bad feelings through actual otherwise endangered losses out of a loved person to an opponent.
Into the Brazil, the fresh Personal Envy Index are modified (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) For Colombia, there are no psychometric education out of a specific level to your romantic jealousy
From the Latin american perspective, discover a type for the Chile of the Directory of Habits of one’s Couple That can cause Envy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). When you look at the Mexico, good Multidimensional Way of measuring Envy (Diaz-Loving, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) might have been elaborated and you can a preliminary research are done with new Multidimensional Directory regarding Intimate Envy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). As well, previous studies failed to carry out Factorial Confirmatory Data (CFA) in order to validate brand new basis build found, and you can reduced precision profile have been used in its facts (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) or short products were used (Mota et al., 2016).
Brand new IJS put up for Mathes and you will Severa (1981) is one of the most used scales to possess researching personal jealousy, it discover half a dozen activities you to assess the susceptibility to dangers relevant to: (a) Partner’s unfaithfulness and you will relationships anyone else (points step one, step three, twelve, 14, 15, sixteen, 20, twenty-two, 23, and twenty five); (b) Partner’s dominance (circumstances dos, step 3, 4, eight, 10, 13, 17, 20, and you will 23); (c) An enthusiastic untrustworthy lover (issues step one, cuatro, 6, 19, and you will 21); (d) Lover’s dated schedules (facts 11, twenty-four, twenty-six, twenty-seven, and you can twenty-eight); (e) Lover’s indifference (products 8, nine and you may 24); and (f) Lover’s kept family relations which have old dates and you will gender distinctions (points 5 and 18).
The devices listed above have demostrated sufficient levels of validity and you can reliability
You can find five training having checked with respect to the reliability and you will validity. Mathes and you may Severa (1981) establish a couple of training, and very first study did the building of your measure that have 39 things, that has been shorter to 28 affairs immediately after analytical study. Next, during the an extra investigation, IJS was applied close to almost every other balances one examined close love-links, insecurity, self-respect and an ad hoc survey away from independent identities, confirming, based on theory, the excellent from envy, the higher the degree of Close love additionally the lower the fresh new separate name of your couple. Inside analysis, we report an excellent coefficient out-of reliability out-of .ninety five on complete size. For the a third data, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you may Cock (1982), in order to stretch brand new indications of legitimacy, used the IJS and two behavioral actions: (a) possibility whenever met with a competitor and you can (b) expressions out of possessiveness towards the mate, through a telephone call that they designed to the person who took part in the study. New asked correlations was received, and that once more offered the brand new legitimacy of your own scale. Eventually, inside the a fourth study, Mathes, Roter and Joerger (1982) corroborated new convergent legitimacy out of IJS along with other scales that evaluated close jealousy.
No comment yet, add your voice below!